| 113 | 0 | 32 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的 探讨对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction,NSTEMI)患者采取急诊预检分诊的临床价值。方法 回顾性收集2023年2月至2024年2月济南市槐荫区人民医院救治的80例NSTEMI患者病例,根据预检分诊模式的不同,分为观察组(急诊预检分诊模式)和对照组(常规预检分诊模式)。对比急救时间、急救效率以及满意度。结果 观察组心电图完成时间、术前准备时间、球囊扩张时间均比对照组短(P<0.001)。观察组经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)支架置入成功率为95.00%,显著高于对照组的75.00%(P=0.012);观察组院内死亡率为2.50%,显著低于对照组的15.00%(P=0.048)。观察组医护人员护理满意度为100.00%,患者及家属护理满意度为97.50%,均显著高于对照组的80.00%和77.50%(P=0.003,0.007)。结论 急诊预检分诊流程的实施可有效缩短急性胸痛NSTEMI患者的急救时间,提高急救效率,改善医护人员和患者的满意度。
Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical value of emergency pre triage in patients with Non ST elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI). Methods A retrospective collection was conducted on 80 NSTEMI patients treated at Huaiyin District People's Hospital in Jinan City from February 2023 to February 2024. According to different pre examination triage modes, they were divided into an observation group(emergency pre examination triage mode) and a control group(routine pre examination triage mode). Comparinge emergency response time, efficiency,and satisfaction. Results The completion time of electrocardiogram, preoperative preparation time, and balloon dilation time in the observation group were all shorter than those in the control group(P<0.001). The success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) stent implantation in the observation group was 95.00%, significantly higher than the control group's 75.00 %(P=0.012); The in-hospital mortality rate of the observation group was 2.50 %,significantly lower than the control group's 15.00%(P=0.048). The nursing satisfaction rate of medical staff in the observation group was 100.00%, and the nursing satisfaction rate of patients and their families was 97.50%, both significantly higher than the control group's 80.00% and 77.50%(P=0.003, 0.007). Conclusion The implementation of the emergency pre-triage process can effectively shorten the emergency time for NSTEMI patients with acute chest pain, improve emergency efficiency, and enhance the satisfaction of medical staff and patients.
[1] Simon J, Guptha S, Rajalakshmi KV, et al. Evaluating Cardiovascular Risks:The Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio and the Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio As High-Risk Heart Score Predictors in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction(NSTEMI)and Unstable Angina Patients[J]. Cureus, 2024,16(5):e61279.
[2] Malek S, Kasim S. Advancing non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction risk assessment with artificial intelligencebased algorithms[J]. Lancet Digit Health, 2024, 6(7):e434-e435.
[3] Siddiqui MU, Chiuzan C, Siddiqui MD, et al. Temporal Pattern of CABG and PCI after Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Among Elderly Patients from NHDS[J]. Cureus, 2020,12(1):e6814.
[4] Peiyuan H, Jingang Y, Haiyan X, et al. The Comparison of the Outcomes between Primary PCI, Fibrinolysis, and No Reperfusion in Patients>/=75 Years Old with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction:Results from the Chinese Acute Myocardial Infarction(CAMI)Registry[J]. PLoS One, 2016,11(11):e0165672.
[5]朱玉凤,赵春云,翁静,等.急诊护理流程优化在心肌梗死患者抢救中的应用体会[J].中国医药指南, 2019,17(16):191-192.
[6] Kurisu S, Fujiwara H. Assessing a Myocardial Area at Risk in Non-ST Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Wall Motion Abnormalities Using Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Radionuclide Imaging[J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(2):e55125.
[7] Wang Y, Wang XD, Yao JW, et al. The Impact of the Duration of Cardiac Troponin I Elevation on the Clinical Prognosis as Well as Incidence of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Respectively in Elderly Non-ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients without PCI[J]. J Inflamm Res, 2021,14:6907-6916.
[8]陈莉.急性心肌梗死预检分诊判断及护理[J].家庭生活指南, 2020(1):115.
[9]吴琳,李雪,秦臻臻.急诊电子预检分诊系统改善急性心肌梗死患者PCI术后继发心肌缺血性灌注损伤的研究[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2018, 13(5):426-428.
[10]徐湘华,潘笑,包盈,等.急诊预检分诊在急性胸痛非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者救治中的应用[J].现代实用医学,2023, 35(1):66-69.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13919/j.issn.2095-6274.ZHJY202408008
中图分类号:R542.22
引用信息:
[1]王启远.急诊预检分诊在非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者救治中的应用[J].中华灾害救援医学,2024,11(09):1028-1030.DOI:10.13919/j.issn.2095-6274.ZHJY202408008.
2024-09-28
2024-09-28